Explore and learn the 5 scenarios for 2050, shown below. Then vote.
Transportation in C

 

Most of the growth occurs near Eagle Mountain, where there is little existing infrastructure, so more spending is required to construct new roads that serve the west side of Utah County. Drive times across the valley are moderate. Homes and jobs are built in a somewhat compact pattern, and investment in cycling and pedestrian infrastructure is moderately increased, so some daily trips can be completed without driving your car. The amount of time we spend overall in the car is moderate, and so is the amount of money we spend on fuel and maintenance. Road and transit investment includes a bridge across Utah Lake, multiple freeways to and near Eagle Mountain, TRAX south through the valley, TRAX to Eagle Mountain, and FrontRunner that’s double tracked to run every 15 minutes. UTA ridership increases by 18,000 daily boardings vs. the lowest scenario. Significant additional funding is required to build the new public transportation infrastructure, as well as the many new freeways. 

The chart below shows the cost in billions of dollars countywide on road and transit construction across scenarios:


 The chart below shows the annual average costs spent by an household on driving across scenarios:

 The chart below shows the average annual hours spent in a vehicle by a family of 4 across scenarios:  


The chart below shows the travel time in minutes across Utah Valley during the PM rush hour across scenarios:

Compare & Favorite Transportation in Each Scenario
Select your favorite outcome to tell us which outcome you prefer and keep track of which scenario you like.